MU Extension MU Extension       University of Missouri    ●    Columbia    ●    Kansas City       Missouri S&T     ●    St. Louis

MissouriFamilies.org - Money Matters - Consumer Action

 

Feature Articles: Family Finances


Poverty Trends

Brenda Procter, M.S., State Specialist & Instructor Personal Financial Planning, University of Missouri Extension; Updated by Marilyn Preston, MA, Human Development and Family Studies, University of Missouri Extension

 

The word "poverty" brings different images to mind for different people. Some may think of a homeless person; others may think of a mother who is not able to make ends meet; still others may think of a third-world nation and starvation. The United States government established an official, though now often criticized, measure of poverty. The official measure is the basis for determining eligibility for most means-tested programs.
 

In the 1960s, Molly Orshansky, of the Social Security Administration, developed the first official poverty thresholds. She knew that a 1955 study had found that families spent about one-third of their after-tax income on food. She determined the value of the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Economy Food Plan - designed only to meet a family's nutritional needs in the short run - and multiplied by three. The measure adjusts for family size. It is basically the same measure we use today, even though spending patterns have changed dramatically since then.
 

The Census Bureau later adopted the Orshansky measures as the official poverty thresholds. The Census Bureau updates the figures each year for inflation using the consumer price index; however, there have only been minor changes in the way the figures are calculated since their inception. Currently, the poverty threshold for a family of four is $22,050. See http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/09poverty.shtml for current poverty guidelines.
 

Many argue that this method of calculation is obsolete and does not show the true picture of poverty. Families now spend less than one-fifth of their income on food. Housing prices, health care expenses and childcare costs have gone up, forcing families to spend a higher proportion of their income on these items.
 

As median family income has grown over time, poverty figures have not been adjusted upward at the same rate. For example, when the poverty thresholds were first introduced in the early 1960s, the threshold for a family of four - $16,530 in 1998 dollars - was 42 percent of the median income for that family size. By 2005, because of real growth in family income, the poverty threshold was only 32.9 percent of the median. 1  In other words, relative to the average family, poor families have not fared as well.
 

There are other arguments that current poverty thresholds do not reflect what it takes to make ends meet in today's society. To read more about this subject, see http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/povmeas.html.
 

Historically in the United States, the poverty rate has gone up and down, but there has been an overall downward trend for several decades. In the late 1950s, the overall poverty rate for individuals in the United States was 22 percent (39.5 million individuals). In the 1960s, there was a dramatic decline in the poverty rate to about 12.1 percent. Due to a slowing economy, the rate rose slightly in the early 1970s but soon began to decrease again.
 

By the mid 1970s the poverty rate stabilized around 11.5 percent until the late seventies. By 1983, the poverty rate was at 15.2 percent and through most of the 80s it was around 13 percent. In 1993, it reached a high of 15.1 percent but fell steadily through the remaining decade. In 2007, the poverty rate was around 12.5 percent (33.7 million people). The state of Missouri rates 21st in the Union in comparison to other states, based on a three-year average (2005-2007) rate. 2
 

It is important to remember that these figures reflect an average of all groups and some groups fare better than others. Various groups, such as female-headed households, tend to have much higher rates of poverty. 3
 

Those living in rural areas tend to still have a higher rate of poverty than those who live in urban areas. The poverty rate in 2007 for those living inside metropolitan areas (including cities and suburbs) was 12.4 percent while the poverty rate for those outside metropolitan areas was 16.6 percent. Note: The rate for inner cities is still higher than other areas. The poverty rate for inner cities is higher than rural areas (17.2 percent compared to 16.6 percent). 4
 

Many assume that the elderly are worse off than other populations in this country. By official poverty measures, however, this is not true. The children of this country are actually more likely to live in poverty than are the elderly. For example, in 2006, the elderly poverty rate (including those people 65 years and over) was 14 percent while the child poverty rate (including children under 18 years of age) was 27 percent. 5 Cost-of-living adjustments to Social Security payments to the elderly have protected many elderly people from falling below the poverty line.
 

Through the 1980s and 1990s, many children lived in female-headed households where poverty conditions are much more likely. In 2007, the poverty rate for married couples was 4.9 percent while it was 28.3 percent for female-headed households. The rate is even higher for some minority groups. 6 Unlike Social Security benefits, welfare benefits are not indexed to inflation. Programs such as the Earned Income Tax Credit and the Child Care Credit may be important in lowering child poverty rates.
 

Great need among children is also reflected in the increased participation in Nutrition Assistance Programs. For instance, between 1990 and 2007 the percentage of children qualifying for the United States Free and Reduced School Lunch program grew by over 25 percent to 30.5 million children qualifying for free lunch each day. 6
 

The School Breakfast Program was established in 1966 on a limited basis and then given permanent authorization in 1975 to help schools provide nutritious breakfasts to their students. Eligibility for the program is based on household income. Children in households receiving Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) or food stamp benefits may be automatically eligible. Studies have found that those who participate in the breakfast program receive higher scores on standardized tests. 7
 

For more information on the School Breakfast Program, School Lunch Programs and various other food programs in the US, see the Food Research & Action Center's website at http://frac.org. 8 See http://www.fns.usda.gov/fns/ for more information on Nutrition Assistance Programs.
 

Some believe that the quickest way for people to escape poverty is to simply "get a job." However, in many communities, jobs with living wages are extremely limited. If someone worked full time at the current Federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour, his or her yearly salary would be $15,080 ($1256.66 per month). The poverty threshold for a family with two members is $1214 per month.
 

Others believe that many are "mooching" from the system and collecting hundreds of dollars per month in welfare benefits. The average welfare recipient in Missouri is a 28-year-old single mother with two children. The maximum Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) benefit in Missouri for a family of three is $292 per month. In 2008, the average monthly TANF benefit was $234. 9
 

There are no simple solutions to problems associated with poverty. Many who are trapped in poverty are dealing with issues such as domestic violence, mental and physical ailments, caring for a loved one, substance abuse, literacy, transportation and childcare. Thousands of children are suffering from the effects of poverty and falling behind those who are not. Single mothers and those who cannot find jobs with living wages still struggle. 9 10
 

To the extent that we do not protect their families from poverty, we know that children are much more likely to go hungry and more likely to be hospitalized. Poverty is also associated with higher dropout rates, higher rates of incarceration, poorer academic performance, and significantly higher rates of depression. To strengthen our families and build stronger communities, we must continue looking for better ways to meet the needs of those who live in poverty.
 

To test your overall knowledge about poverty, take a review quiz.

 

 

1 http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/4person.html


2 http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/ranks/rank34.html


3 Institute for Research on Poverty, http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/irp/


4 http://www.census.gov/prod/2008pubs/acs-09.pdf


5 http://www.statehealthfacts.org/comparebar.jsp?ind=10&cat=1


6 http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/histpov/hstpov4.html


7 http://www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/Lunch/AboutLunch/NSLPFactSheet.pdf


8 http://www.frac.org


9 http://www.dss.mo.gov/re/pdf/fsd/fsd2008.pdf


10 Haskins, R. and Blank, R. Welfare reform reauthorization, Poverty Research News, Nov./Dec. 2001, Vol. 5, No.6, Joint Center for Poverty Research.


11 MRI Study on the Status of Persons Leaving Welfare, prepared for the Missouri Department of Social Services by Midwest Research Institute, January 2000 - August 2000.

 

 

 


University of Missouri logo links to http://extension.missouri.edu

Site Administrator:
mofamweb@missouri.edu
Copyright  ADA  Equal Opportunity


MissouriFamilies is produced by the College of Human Environmental Sciences,
Extension Division, University of Missouri

 

Last update: Thursday, July 23, 2009